“Woke”: How a Word Changed Meaning – and Why You Should Care

The strange journey of “woke”, shifting public language, and what it means for brand strategy in 2025

Few words have travelled as far, or mutated as quickly, as “woke”. It began as a compliment, became a political football, turned into an insult, and now sits in that awkward linguistic territory where most people use it but few agree on what it actually means.

That alone makes it interesting – but for marketers, it’s essential reading.

Why? Because brands operate inside cultural language. They don’t get to choose the meanings of words – but they absolutely feel the consequences when meanings change.

Let’s break down how woke shifted from a socially conscious label to a catch-all insult – and what that teaches marketers about cultural volatility, brand risk, and the power of reclaimed language.

The Marketing Made Clear Podcast

This article features content from the Marketing Made Clear Podcast – check it out on all good platforms.

A Short History: From “Stay Woke” to Culture-War Punchline

The word woke originally emerged in African-American English in the early 20th century. To “stay woke” meant to be alert to racial injustice – not a slogan, not jargon, but lived experience. It carried weight, seriousness, and community meaning.

Fast-forward to the 2010s and the phrase entered mainstream progressive culture. People used it as shorthand for being socially aware: racial justice, LGBTQ+ rights, environmentalism, feminism – essentially being a decent human being with a functioning moral compass.

Then the mood shifted.

From around 2015, woke became politicised in the US, amplified by commentators who framed it as elitist, preachy, and overreaching. By the early 2020s, UK tabloids had imported the insult with gusto. Before long, woke moved from badge-of-honour to playground taunt – the linguistic equivalent of calling someone “soft.”

This pivot was not accidental. As George Orwell famously warned, controlling language is a shortcut to controlling thought. Once a word becomes easy to mock, it becomes easy to dismiss.

And no group loves a simple cultural insult more than the British commentariat.

Why “Woke” Became a Negative Term

Words rarely fall from grace on their own. The shift often follows a pattern:

  • A positive identity label becomes visible
  • Opponents gain political advantage by ridiculing it
  • Media narratives repeat the ridicule
  • The word becomes shorthand for an entire worldview
  • Nuance dies, the word becomes toxic, and the public uses it ironically

This is textbook linguistic drift.

But it also exposes something deeper: the discomfort society feels when moral progress becomes cultural expectation. Labelling something “woke” became a way to reject or trivialise any topic that people didn’t want to engage with seriously.

And where there is cultural friction… marketing departments are never far away.

The “Woke” Label and Brands: A Risk, a Weapon, or a Badge?

Brands have been pulled into the woke debate more than they ever asked for.

Brands accused of being “woke”:

  • Bud Light – after partnering with a trans influencer, prompting backlash, boycotts, and significant sales decline.
  • Disney – criticised for supporting LGBTQ+ rights in staff policies and storytelling.
  • Nike – faced both praise and condemnation for supporting Colin Kaepernick, with some consumers literally burning their trainers.
  • Ben & Jerry’s – long-term social activism that sparks routine outrage cycles but also deep loyalty from core fans.

In every case, the backlash came not because the brand made a statement, but because opponents framed those actions as “woke”.

As unpleasant as it sounds, being labelled “woke” is now a reputational hazard.

But here is the twist:

Many brands willingly accept the label because it strengthens loyalty among their target audience.

Purpose-driven brands don’t just take stances; they commit to them. For cause-aligned customer bases, being called “woke” is often free advertising.

This is where Kotler’s positioning theory meets reality: every brand must choose who it serves – and who it doesn’t.

What Should Marketers Do? A Practical Lens

Brands should not fear social issues – but they must handle them with strategic intelligence.

1. Know Your Audience Segments

If 80 percent of your customers lean progressive, taking a stance may strengthen your brand. If your base is more divided, caution matters.

2. Don’t Perform – Commit

3. Consistency Beats Noise

Brands that flit between causes feel opportunistic.

4. Pick Causes That Align with Your Business

Fast-fashion brands suddenly lecturing the world about sustainability feel like satire.

5. Expect Backlash – Whatever You Do

The trick is to ensure the people you annoy weren’t your customers anyway.

  • Some audiences reward activism.
  • Others punish it.
  • The public can sniff out performative activism quicker than you can say “new tagline”.
  • Weak, shallow, or one-day-a-year activism is more damaging than silence.
  • Brands that integrate values into daily operations rarely face backlash.
  • Outdoor brands speaking on environmental issues make sense.
  • Purpose-led branding always triggers someone.

Other Words That Changed Meaning Over Time

The “woke” story isn’t unique. Language evolves, communities reclaim words, and cultural power shifts.

Queer

Originally meaning “strange” or “peculiar.”
Later weaponised as a slur against LGBTQ+ people.
Today reclaimed by many within the community as a positive, empowered identity.

For marketers, the lesson is simple: never assume a word’s current meaning is fixed. And never use loaded terms carelessly.

Snowflake

Once referred to uniqueness.
Now means someone easily offended.
A complete semantic pivot.

Cancel

Used to mean “terminate a subscription.”
Now refers to coordinated social shaming.
A transformation powered almost entirely by digital culture.

Organic

Originally purely agricultural.
Now a marketing term stretched to cover anything from coffee to shampoo to toothpaste.
Its meaning is both powerful and vague – a dangerous combination.

Each example reminds us: language is never stable. Marketing that relies on cultural terms must continuously adapt or risk looking out of touch.

Why Marketers Need to Understand Linguistic Drift

A word’s meaning is not decided by etymology. It’s shaped by:

  • media narratives
  • political agendas
  • cultural uptake
  • community reinterpretation
  • generational slang
  • algorithmic amplification

This means language is one of the most volatile tools in marketing.
Brands that track cultural shifts will thrive.
Brands that assume words “still mean what they used to” will fail.

No marketer wants to launch a well-meaning campaign only to discover the public now uses the word in a completely different way.

So… Should Brands Be Woke?

Here’s the honest, mildly opinionated answer:

Brands shouldn’t aim to be “woke”. They should aim to be consistent.

If your values are real, embedded, and authentic, people may call you “woke” – positively or negatively. That’s fine. Integrity survives insults.

If you are inconsistent, opportunistic, or hollow, your brand will suffer whether the internet calls you woke, asleep, or somewhere in between.

The word might fade. The culture war may move on. But the underlying issue remains:

Consumers reward brands that behave like adults.

TLDR (Summary)

  • Woke began as a positive term meaning socially aware, originally within Black American culture.

  • It became politicised and later weaponised as an insult, particularly by conservative media.

  • Brands increasingly get caught in the crossfire, especially around purpose-driven marketing.

  • Audiences reward authenticity but punish performative activism.

  • Other words like queer, snowflake, and cancel have undergone major meaning changes too.

  • Marketers must understand linguistic drift because language shapes brand perception.

  • Brands shouldn’t aim to be “woke” but should aim to be consistent, values-driven, and culturally aware.